Who has a stronger army Russia or USA? – Since the end of World War II, two superpowers, the Soviet Union and the United States have taken the lead on the world stage.
Who has a stronger army Russia or USA?
MilitaryEzyInfo.com | The development of nuclear weapons only strengthened their position. Since then, the two countries have come to view each other as potential enemies. During the Cold War, an arms race had begun. The situation could only be likened to a cocked trigger, where the slightest move could have irreversible consequences, and when the world was on the brink of World War III, there was indeed a critical situation.
Today, relations between Russia and the U.S. are once again heated, with disagreements arising against the backdrop of real military events in Syria and Ukraine, and even though both sides understand that diplomatic ways to resolve contradictions are most desirable for everyone, open confrontation is not only possible but highly likely.
Exacerbating the situation is the fact that the US is not just a member of the NATO military bloc. The US is practically the backbone of it. The military bloc established by the Soviet Union no longer exists, so in the event of war, it can rely on China for support.
There is no need to be a professional analyst who does not understand the situation. Everyone wants to know which army is stronger, Russia’s or America’s. Let me quickly point out that there is no clear answer here. The combat capability of the armies is based on several indicators. If that is used as a basis for comparison, leaders will move from country to country. Compare the Russian and US armies on the most obvious parameters and hope you never find the answer to the question of which army is stronger.
Army Strength Comparison
Who has a stronger army Russia or USA? – As you may have already guessed, the numbers are coming. Where did they come from? The suspicion is fair – no official source publishes data on army equipment. It just so happens that leaked information, data from foreign intelligence agencies, and analytics are available for free. This means that the values given below are incorrect, and we do not need to know them in order to make comparisons for the year 2020. It is enough to establish the order of dominance of this or that army. Since the actual picture will not change dramatically, we will limit ourselves to approximate data, and in some cases, round up.
The combat efficiency of an army depends directly on the total population. The approximate number of Russians is 143 million, while in the U.S. the number is almost double that, at 315 million. What does this data indicate? In a military transition, civilians must be added to the military. In the case of the US, there would be more civilians involved.
It is clear that not all citizens can be drafted into the military. In the event of a shift to martial law, the mobilization will only affect those who are on the military register. This mobilized reserve in Russia is 30 million and in the US it is 56 million.
These are theoretical numbers because neither country can mobilize its reserves to the fullest extent. The reason for this is the lack of weapons, equipment, and funds. However, the advantage of the US is that it is much more effective at replenishing its own military losses.
It is difficult to compare armies in terms of the number of troops. Assume that Russia has up to one million military personnel, of which about 300,000 are conscripts. The U.S. military, on the other hand, is composed entirely of professional contract soldiers. Its manpower strength is 1.4 million. There is little point in comparing these two parameters.
Who has a stronger army Russia or USA? – Despite the fact that the U.S. military has the highest number of personnel, the Russian military leads in terms of technical equipment for ground forces.
First of all, the number of tanks is a matter of concern. About 15,000 tanks have been fielded, and after the launch of the new generation of Armata tanks, the policy is to enhance the equipment of new models for military use. The Defense Ministry plans to increase the number of Armatas to a maximum of 2,300 tanks by 2023.
At the same time, earlier generations of T-80 and T-90 tanks have not yet become obsolete. Independent experts point out that the US Abrams lags behind the Armata on many parameters. Note that statistically, the number of tanks in the US army does not exceed 8,5,000.
The number of APCs is about the same, with a slight edge on the Russian side: 25,000 units to about 27,000.
The Russians have the advantage when it comes to MLRS, towed artillery, and self-propelled artillery, while the US is many times inferior in terms of equipment.
Now it’s time to point out the benefits of military service. For military chairs and training, our armed forces have more specialists who can maintain the equipment of the ground forces. With conscription, you have six months to learn the skills you need.
NATO forces had long been considered to have air superiority based on the number of aircraft they had. Even if only the US military was used as a comparison, it had a clear advantage. In terms of the number of all aircraft (land forces), the US military had a 13,000-car advantage over Russia, which had about 3,000.
Recently, however, there had been a massive leak of information from American sources. It showed that the Army had no more than 2,000 actual combat aircraft. Even the commander of the U.S. Air Force had to admit that Russia was rapidly catching up with the U.S. in numbers and capabilities. 11,000 planes, where did they go? It is true that the resources of transport aviation were taken into account during the calculations. The data was also supplemented by taking into account the armament of NATO countries.
Don’t be fooled by the fact that transport aviation plays an important role in supplying the army. They are the most important part of the logistics organization. Russian experts say that there is no need to develop logistics. It is the Americans who are accustomed to fighting on someone else’s land; we have no right to anyone’s land. If there is an armed conflict, we will defend the borders of our country. However, because this interpretation is considered unconvincing and short-sighted, Russian military aviation is lagging behind in proportion:
– Military helicopters: 6/1.
– Attack aircraft: 2/1.
– Fighter aircraft: 3/1.
These statistics don’t inspire optimism, but since 2016, Russia has embarked on a modernization of its fighter fleet. The U.S. was the first to unveil the fifth-generation F-22 to the world, but the upgraded Su-35-S can seriously compete with the famous “Raptor.” The Russian Air Force can compete with the F-15 with the Su-27-SM, which has no rival among the 4th generation aircraft. Finally, the testing period is coming to an end, and deliveries of the fifth-generation PAK FA aircraft, using the Su-57 as an indicator, to the Russian military have already begun.
To date, due to increased funding, the fleet of aircraft has been intensively replenished. If the course of re-equipment is not changed, the difference in the number of aircraft will be practically insignificant by 2021. But the most important factor in determining air supremacy is the state of air defense: the S-400 and S-500 air defense systems ensure coverage of the air perimeter. Even American experts point out that Russia’s level of air defense development is at the highest level.
The naval status of both armies can be considered parity. In some areas, the domestic fleet is lagging behind the western fleet, in other areas it is leading it. However, the difference in the number of ships is not significant. Below is some approximate data on the number of US ships relative to the number of ships in the Russian fleet:
– All warships: 400/300;
– Aircraft carriers: 10/1;
– Submarines: 72/79;
– Frigates: 15/4;
– Destroyers: 62/13;
– Corvettes: 0/75;
– Security ships: 13/65.
Now, let’s do a little analysis. We are all well aware of the problems that arose during the transfer of the Mistrals’ helicopter carrier to us. The Ministry of Defense has officially stated that this unfortunate incident will have no effect on the military strength of the Russian fleet. The strategic plan does not include the use of combat helicopters far from the mainland.
So the Navy has no plans to build more aircraft carriers at the moment. According to experts, the U.S. advantage in the number of aircraft carriers may not be taken into account when comparing the actual capabilities of the armed forces. Russia, however, has a clear advantage in submarines. We are not even in the numbers. Most of our submarines are capable of carrying nuclear weapons, while the US has only a few.
The real obstacle to US-Russia relations is nuclear weapons. It is known that our own military has more warheads than the US military. But keep in mind that Russia’s missiles are technically more equipped. After Russia formally refused to reduce its nuclear arsenal, the US is trying to deploy missile defenses near its borders with the help of NATO countries. However, Russia’s position on this issue is tough enough because our nuclear weapons can serve as a deterrent and ensure relative world order.
He concludes that the U.S. military has achieved the status of the world’s most powerful military thanks to statistics. However, when secondary factors are taken into account, their lead is questionable. Of course, the Americans are not sitting still, and Donald Trump has announced an increase in the military budget. But the course adopted by Russia for reform will also take full shape in the coming years, so we can talk about the state of parity in the armed forces as we head into 2020.
Who has a stronger army Russia or USA?